Legal Opinion

B & M Construction, Inc. v. Mueller

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 26, 1989No. 2 CA-CV 89-0081PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LIVERMORE, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff B & M Construction, Inc. entered into a contract for construction work with defendant Mueller Development Co. as owner and general contractor of an apartment development. B & M sued Mueller in two counts for breach of contract and to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Mueller demanded arbitration. The arbitrator ruled in favor of B & M on the contract claim and that award was confirmed by judgment. B & M then successfully sought summary judgment on the lien foreclosure claim. On this appeal Mueller contends that the lien claim should also have been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Cashway Concrete & Materials v. Sanner Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  3. Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. CVN Group, Inc. v. DelgadoTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Portage Park Capital, LLC v. A.L.L. Masonry Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2024
  4. CVN Group, Inc. v. DelgadoTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. CVN Group, Inc. v. DelgadoTexas Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API