Christen v. Ruhlman

Caspar Lusse, who was made garnishee in the first, and is plaintiff in injunction in the second of these two consolidated cases, ¡has appealed from a judgment decreeing the notarial act of sale of a grocery establishment and partnership interest from R. Ruhlman to .him, C. Lusse, on the twenty-seventh of March, 1869, to be null, and *571ordering the said parties to produce “the assets and property in which the interest of said Ruhlman was seized,” (specifically describing it,) to be sold under Christen’s execution against Ruhlman, “in order that the purchaser of said interest, at sheriff’s sale,…