Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Steck & State Farm Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 17, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner was seriously injured in an automobile accident. The insurer of the other vehicle involved in the accident paid the full policy limit of $300,000 to settle petitioner’s personal injury claim. Thereafter, petitioner, whose personal liability policy with respondent had coverage limits of $100,000/300,000 and underinsurance limits of $100,000, sought underinsurance benefits from respondent. Respondent denied the claim, asserting that there was no underinsurance coverage because the coverage on the other vehicle exceeded petitioner’s coverage.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Maurizzio v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. In re the Arbitration between Matarasso & Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. In re the Arbitration between Commercial Union Insurance & RaymondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. PanettaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty v. HouseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Arbitration Between Utica Mutual Insurance & LenoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API