Legal Opinion
Matthew Rogers v. Advance Bank
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 5, 2015No. 13-CV-1473PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Senior Judge:
Appellant, Matthew Rogers (“Rogers”), appeals from the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment to Advance Bank, appellee, on a complaint for breach of contract, judicial foreclosure, and/or judicial sale. Rogers argues that the court erred in granting the motion without first requiring that the parties participate in mediation pursuant to D.C.Code § 42-815(b) and § 815.02 (2012 Repl.). After review of the record and relevant statutory provisions, we conclude that summary judgment was proper in this case. In short, we are satisfied that mediation is not specifically…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Johnson v. Fairfax Village Condominium IV Unit Owners Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Wyman v. RoesnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Dobyns v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co. N.A. v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co. N.A. v. HendersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Residential Credit Opportunities Trust v. PobleteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Edwards & Jones v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSBDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026
- Middleton v. PrattDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.