Slack v. Elkins
Court of Appeals of Georgia
. Complaint; from city court of Tifton — Judge E. Eve.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
1. Under the facts stated in the defendant’s motion, it was error to refuse, at the trial term, to allow the default to be opened. The defendant had paid the costs, the showing under oath set up a meritorious defense, and the movant offered to plead instanter, and announced ready to proceed with the trial.
2. Generally the holder of a promissory note, pledged to him as collateral, may enforce it for the entire amount against the maker as obligor; holding, as trustee for the pledgor, any surplus after the payment of his debt; but if the maker has a valid defense against the original payee, the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Franklin Mortgage Co. v. McDuffieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Henderson v. EllarbeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Blaylock v. Walker County BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Gleaton v. Bank of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Turner v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.