Smith v. Aggregate Supply Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Mobley, Justice.(a) In their brief counsel for the defendaxxt state that the dexnurrex’s to the petition are based upon matters which are contended to be defects in the contract between the parties and not upon the allegations of the petition, and they further concede that whether the contract violates the rule against perpetuities depends oxx whether said contract is an option or a lease. They contend that the contract creates only an option to purchase minerals; that, under its terms, it may extend over an undetermixxed nuxnber of years; and that it therefore violates the rule against…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Turner v. PeacockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Warehouses Inc. v. WetherbeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Brown v. MathisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Penick v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Williams v. J. M. High Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Chalkley v. WardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Higginbottom v. Thiele Kaolin Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Lowry v. Norris Lake Shores Development Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- St. Regis Paper Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Floyd v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.