Legal Opinion

Ray v. Stuckey

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1902Published

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Crawford county: Geo. ClemeNtsoN, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtOassoday, C. J.

This is an action to recover damages for injuries sustained by tbe plaintiff’s mare being torn and lacerated June 28, 1898, by reason of becoming entangled in an alleged partition fence built and maintained by tbe der fendant wholly upon bis own land, and wbicb is alleged to bave been so negligently and dangerously constructed as to endanger tbe lives and safety of tbe plaintiff’s borses and other domestic animals pasturing on bis adjoining lands. Tbe defendant answered by way of a general denial. At tbe close of the testimony tbe jury returned a verdict in favor of tbe plaintiff, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Curry v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Carey v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Peterson v. Northern Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Martin v. StewartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  5. McCann v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API