Legal Opinion

McKissock v. Groom

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 7, 1899PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Moniteau Circuit Court. — IIoN. I). W. SltACKLEKOEI), Judge. (1) Tbe mental faculties of William B. Groom were very mucb impaired. He was subject to tbe influence of tbe defendants and tbeir wives, wbo did not permit bim to escape tbeir watchful attention.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Moniteau Circuit Court. — IIoN. I). W. SltACKLEKOEI), Judge. (1) Tbe mental faculties of William B. Groom were very mucb impaired. He was subject to tbe influence of tbe defendants and tbeir wives, wbo did not permit bim to escape tbeir watchful attention. His free agency' was destroyed, and tbe wishes of defendants were substituted for tbe will of them father, Tbe influence exercised by defendants over tbeir aged father, mentally and physically infirm, constituted such control as to make tbeir acts, in tbe circumstances of tbe case, contrary to law, and tbe deed voidable at tbe…

1Opinion of the Court

BURGESS, I.

This is a suit by the daughters and .grandson of William B. Groom, deceased, against his two *463surviving sons, Valentine Groom and Thomas M. Groom, to set aside and cancel certain deeds executed by their father to them, by which he conveyed to them all of his land. The grounds upon which the deeds are sought to be set aside are the want of mental capacity upon the part of William B. Groom to make the deeds, and that they were obtained by undue influence on the part of the defendants.

On August 21, 1893, William B. Groom had a stroke of paralysis in consequence of which he was helpless…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carl v. GabelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Norton v. PaxtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  3. Von De Veld v. JudySupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  4. Dingman v. RomineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  5. Cutler v. ZollingerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  2. Lastofka v. LastofkaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  3. Bushman v. BushmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  4. Bushman v. BarlowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  5. Studybaker v. CofieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API