Legal Opinion

Wheatman v. Andrews

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 31, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On demurrer to pleas.

1Opinion of the Court

■ The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

The' declaration is on the common counts in assumpsit with bill of particulars specifying the sum of $800 cash advanced and loaned by plaintiff to defendant’s testator in Iris lifetime. The first plea, of general issue, is not demurred to. The second is a plea of plene administravit (3 Chit. Pl. [7th Am. edi] *943), following the standard form, and the only objection now urged is that it is a dilatory plea and is not accompanied by the affidavit of verification required with pleas of that character. Practice act 1903, § 117; Pamph. L., p. 570.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Everett v. JudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Burlingham v. CrouseSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Clark Thread Co. v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
  4. Robert v. Samuel L. Moore & SonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Advance Piece Dye Works, Inc. v. Travelers Indem. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  2. Hiler v. ForceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API