Legal Opinion
Lomax Holding Co. v. Calitri
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided January 12, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Final judgment entered December 7,1981 reversed, with $30 costs, and final judgment directed in favor of tenant dismissing the petition.
Tenant is the rent-stabilized resident of a three-bedroom apartment situated at 160 East 3rd Street, Manhattan, having originally entered into possession with a cotenant (who has since removed from the premises) in 1977. In September, 1981, tenant, in separate writings, gave notice pursuant to section 226-b of the Real Property Law that he intended to sublet portions of the apartment to two other unrelated persons. It was tenant’s…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Bragar v. Berkeley Associates Co.New York Supreme Court · 1981
4Cited by3 opinions
- 520 East 81st Street Associates v. Roughton-HesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Burroughs Corp. v. Gillman (In Re Electrospace Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Diamond v. MenascheCivil Court of the City of New York · 1988