Legal Opinion

Parrish v. AmSouth Bank, N.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 17, 1995No. 94-1685PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLEIN, Judge.

In this appeal from a final judgment appellant argues that the trial court should have granted her motion to dismiss the complaint because it did not contain allegations that she, a resident of Virginia, was amenable to personal jurisdiction in Florida. Although *1190this error may well have resulted in a reversal if appellant had taken a non-final appeal from the interlocutory order,1 we find the denial of that motion has, in light of subsequent events, become harmless error.

Appellant, a then-resident of St. Lucie county, was one of the organizers of a bank to be formed in St. Lucie…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Gore v. ChillingworthSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  2. Page v. EzellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Kelly v. STATE, DEPT. OF INS.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Levinson v. BroscheDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dennis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
  2. Pitzen v. WoodsDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API