Henson v. McDonald
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FAULKNER, Justice.
Donald Lawrence Henson, defendant below, appeals from a judgment rendered in an ore tenus case against him for wrongful detention of property, in favor of Ruth Angela McDonald. Henson asserts here that Mrs. McDonald’s claim fails to state a cause of action; that the court erred in failing to join an allegedly indispensable party, and in admitting Mrs. McDonald’s property inventory into evidence; and that the judgment is not supported by the evidence. We find no merit in these contentions and affirm.
Dr. Zenas McDonald, Mrs. McDonald’s son, lived with Henson in Henson’s house…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- ELMER TALLANT AGCY. v. Bailey Wood Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dominex, Inc. v. KeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1984