Legal Opinion

Henson v. McDonald

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 30, 1982No. 80-664PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FAULKNER, Justice.

Donald Lawrence Henson, defendant below, appeals from a judgment rendered in an ore tenus case against him for wrongful detention of property, in favor of Ruth Angela McDonald. Henson asserts here that Mrs. McDonald’s claim fails to state a cause of action; that the court erred in failing to join an allegedly indispensable party, and in admitting Mrs. McDonald’s property inventory into evidence; and that the judgment is not supported by the evidence. We find no merit in these contentions and affirm.

Dr. Zenas McDonald, Mrs. McDonald’s son, lived with Henson in Henson’s house…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. ELMER TALLANT AGCY. v. Bailey Wood Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dominex, Inc. v. KeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API