Legal Opinion
Menard v. UCAR Pipeline Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 6, 1985No. 84-140PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Judge.
The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether or not the trial court properly *233granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
Plaintiff, Ricky P. Menard, (hereinafter Menard) appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of defendant, UCAR Pipeline Incorporated (hereinafter UCAR), dismissing his suit for alleged damages based on breach of contract. Menard argues that the summary judgment was improperly granted because there exists a genuine issue of material fact. We affirm.
FACTS
On September 29, 1975 UCAR contracted with Menard’s present landlord, Wendell David, to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ortego v. OrtegoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Woodson Const. Co., Inc. v. RL Abshire Const. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- Welch v. DaigrepontLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
- Haley v. City of OpelousasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Ortego v. OrtegoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dement v. Red River Valley BankLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Ware & Wingate Co., Inc. v. WingateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
- Jack v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
- Precht v. Columbia Gulf Transmission L L CDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2019