Legal Opinion

Pierce and Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 11, 1931No. 13815PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

— The offense is accepting a bribe; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

It was charged in the indictment that appellants were deputy constables, and by appropriate allegations it was charged that they accepted a bribe from E. Sallie. A conspiracy was not alleged. Appellants moved to quash the indictment on the ground that they were improperly joined in a single indictment in the absence of allegations charging a conspiracy. They take the position that there could be no joint liability for failure to discharge a statutory duty, and that their…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Prendergast v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  2. Comer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1888
  3. Loggins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
  4. Nicholas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1887
  5. Watson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grissom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Grisson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API