Legal Opinion

In Re Talmo

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.

Decided February 13, 1996No. 18-25869PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING RELIANT’S MOTION TO MARSHAL ASSETS

ROBERT A. MARK, Bankruptcy Judge.

The Court conducted a hearing on December 5, 1995, on The Rehant Group Limited Partnership’s (“Rehant”) Motion to Apply the Doctrine of Marshahng of Assets Against the FDIC, as Receiver for First American Bank and Trust as to the Rents and Profits Held by the Trustee and to Transfer Lien and to Require Disbursements of Funds (“Marshahng Motion”). After consideration of the record, the arguments of counsel and review of apphcable case law, the Court finds that Rehant is entitled to rehef…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meyer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Heiner v. Colonial Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Topcon Instrument Corp. of America v. West Coast Optical Instruments, Inc. (In Re West Coast Optical Instruments, Inc.)District Court, M.D. Florida · 1992
  4. All American Holding Corp. v. Elgin State BankDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Petersburg Regency LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  2. KPMG Peat Marwick v. Texas Commerce BankDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1997
  3. Hennessey Capital SE, LLC v. David (In Re Miller Engineering, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API