Legal Opinion

Heidt v. Heidt

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2019No. 20180250PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jensen, Justice.

[¶1] Trina Iverson appeals from a district court order finding a prima facie case for modification of primary residential responsibility had not been established with regard to the parties' two youngest children, G.I.H. and G.O.H. Iverson also asserts the district court erred when it denied her motion to amend the findings and order. We reverse the district court's order and remand for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether modification of primary residential responsibility for G.I.H. and G.O.H. is appropriate.

I

[¶2] Iverson and Robert Heidt were divorced in October 2012,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stoppler v. StopplerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Wolt v. WoltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Kartes v. KartesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Schumacker v. SchumackerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Schroeder v. SchroederNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kerzmann v. KerzmannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Baker v. BakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Dogbe v. DogbeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Scott v. ScottNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Heidt v. HeidtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API