Legal Opinion

Dick v. Daylight Garage, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1939No. Appeal, 154PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

The plaintiffs-appellants brought suit as liquidating trustees for the Kensington Security Bank and Trust Company (hereinafter referred to as the bank), to recover upon a collateral promissory note given by the defendants to the bank more than six years before July 26, 1938, when the action was instituted. The defendants pleaded the Statute of Limitations; the appellants pleaded inter alia that payments of interest and principal were made upon the note at varied times within the statutory period. The last payment of $2,200 was credited , on the note on June 10,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Palmer v. GillespieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  2. Wesner v. Stein & GreenawaltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  3. White v. Pittsburgh Vein Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Brightson v. . ClaflinNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Furst v. Building & L. Ass'n, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clinton County1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cole v. LawrenceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Anthracite Trust Co. v. LoughranSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Bell v. Collins, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1940
  4. Goodis v. Meneses, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1964
  5. Johnson v. Shive, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API