Knape v. Livingston Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1DissentWertz, J.
I am unable to agree with the majority opinion that the jury’s answers to the special questions are so inconsistent with the general verdict as to compel a judgment to be entered thereon in favor of the defendant. In my opinion it has always been the policy of this court to affirm the trial court if possible — not to seek some minute technicality on which to reverse the trial court.
' The general verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiff, and the three special questions and answers pertinent in this appeal are:
“1. Do you find that the driver of Defendant’s pickup truck negligently…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Rowell v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
- Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. PointerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- Applegate v. Home Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- DeGraw v. Kansas City & Leavenworth Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951
- Mehl v. CarterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.