Legal Opinion

Haworth v. Montgomery

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1891PublishedCited by 13 opinions

PROM RIIEA. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Kkea County. Arthur Trayror, J.

1Opinion of the CourtLurton, J.

Plaintiff in error, claiming to be a practitioner of medicine, sued the defendant upon *17an account for medical services rendered between December 18, 1889, and January 20, 1890. There was a judgment for the defendant.

By the first section of Chapter 178 of the Acts of 1889 it is provided “that no person shall practice medicine in any of its departments, except dentistry, within this State, unless such person possess all-the qualifications required by this Act.”, The Act then proceeds to prescribe the manner in which one may continue or enter upon the practice of the medical profession.

By…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burroughs v. WebsterIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Cæsar v. CapellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1897
  3. Hamilton v. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
  4. Eastern Building & Loan Ass'n v. BedfordU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1898
  5. Cantrell v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API