Legal Opinion

Mackenzie v. A. Engelhard & Sons Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 6, 1923No. Nos. 3581, 3582PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDenison, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). We have no doubt that, in spite of the withdrawal of the certificate from the court files, the state court retained jurisdiction over the subject matter sufficiently to decree a foreclosure sale valid as between the parties, and for the purpose of this opinion, and without undertaking to decide the questions involved, we assume that the foreclosure of the lien upon the stock was so completely valid that, as against both Eschmann and purchasers pendente lite, Mackenzie acquired the legal title to the stock, and that in an action at law against the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Telegraph Co. v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. St. Romes v. Levee Steam Cotton Press Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Levy v. S. H. Kress & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. MacKenzie v. A. Engelhard & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API