Browne v. Bedford
New York Surrogate's Court
Hearing of exceptions to report of referee to whom were referred the account, and objections thereto, of the administratrix of decedent’s estate, in proceedings for judicial settlement.
1Opinion of the Court
The Surrogate.
When this decedent died, ro April, 1865, he was engaged in the jewelry business in this city, in partnership with his wife’s brother, Franklyn Horton. He left no estate, or substantially none except his interest in that business—an interest then valued at $7,849.26. He left him surviving his widow, and two children—one a boy five years of age, the other a girl of three. Immediately after his death, the widow (not being at that time administratrix) ar*306ranged with her brother, Mr. Horton, that he should retain for a time the interest of the estate in the business of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Beardsley v. . HotchkissNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- In the Matter, Etc., of Estate of WestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Chouteau v. . SuydamNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Hyland v. . BaxterNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- In re BostwickNew York Court of Chancery · 1819
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.