Legal Opinion

Last Will & Testament of Massingale v. Young

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided August 23, 2016No. 2015-CA-00768-COAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARLTON, J.,

FOR THE COURT:

¶1. Haruhiko Murakami appeals the Clarke County Chancery Court’s grant of summary judgment to Janice Young, Jennifer Eakes, and Justin Massingale (collectively, the Appellees). The chancellor found that an additional page added to Johanna Massingale’s will after the will’s execution failed to meet the statutory requirements of a valid codicil or holographic will. 1 In addition, the chancellor found that Johanna’s will failed to incorporate by reference the additional page. Finding no error in the chancellor’s grant of summary judgment to the Appellees, we affirm.

FACTS

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Buckel v. ChaneyMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Deborah JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  3. C. Delbert Hosemann, Jr. v. D. Neil Harris, Sr.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  4. ESTATE OF GRIFFITH v. GriffithMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Estate of Regan v. Estate of LeblancCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the Last Will and Testament of Luke Beard, Deceased: Antonio Christmas v. Diane ChristmasMississippi Supreme Court · 2022
  2. In the Matter of the Last Will and Testament of Luke Beard, Deceased: Antonio Christmas v. Diane ChristmasCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API