Legal Opinion

Ruiz v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 29, 1995PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered on or about October 4, 1994, which denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint for failure to appear for physical examination as required by General Municipal Law § 50-h and to timely file a summons and complaint and proof of service in accordance with CPLR 306-a and 306-b, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion was properly denied insofar as based on plaintiffs failure to appear for a physical examination, where the date for such examination had been postponed indefinitely and defendant never attempted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Best v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Best v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Winston v. Freshwater Wetlands Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Mandel v. Waltco Truck Equipment Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Rybka v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Page v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Southern Tier Plastics, Inc. v. County of BroomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API