Legal Opinion

Fallo v. Tuboscope Inspection

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 5, 1983No. 83-C-0347PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Writ Granted. The pleadings do not express or imply that plaintiff was intentionally injured by anyone. The court of appeal opinion and the plaintiff’s brief in this record point to nothing in the depositions on file from which a reasonable trier of fact could infer that the plaintiff’s injuries resulted from an intentional tort or to show that there is a genuine issue as to a material fact related to the issue decided by the summary judgment. Accordingly, it appears that the trial court was correct in granting the summary judgment. However, because we do not have the entire record before us,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fallo v. Tuboscope Inspection, Intracoastal Pipe Repair & Supply Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fallo v. Tuboscope Inspection, Intracoastal Pipe Repair & Supply Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API