Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Miami v. Jacoby

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 29, 1992No. 91-243Published

1DissentErvin, Judge

I would affirm the order of the judge of compensation claims in its entirety. In so concluding, I agree with the majority that the judge should not have offset the wage loss claimed, because case law is clear that the deemed earnings provision of the statute is inapplicable under such circumstances. I agree also that the judge should have explicitly ruled on the employer’s defense regarding voluntary limitation of income. In consideration of the somewhat unusual circumstances of this case, however, I would not remand the case for further findings.

Because the judge applied deemed earnings…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Coq v. Fuchs Baking Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Morris v. Metal IndustriesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Defrees v. Colt and Dumont/Hit SalesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Rios v. Fred Teitelbaum Const.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  5. Parker v. Eaton Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API