Legal Opinion
O'Neill v. State Highway Department
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 6, 1963PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered
Pee Curiam.
The issue is whether plaintiff is entitled to trial by jury of the factual issues involved in this proceeding in lieu of prerogative writ, brought to compel defendants to condemn lands which plaintiff claims to be hers. The trial court held there was no right to jury trial. The Appellate Division reversed, 77 N. J. Super. 262 (1962), and one judge there dissenting, this appeal was prosecuted as of right. R. R. 1:2-1(b).
Both opinions in the Appellate Division are able and comprehensive statements of the contending .views. We agree with the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- O'NEILL v. State Highway Dept.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
3Cited by6 opinions
- West Milford Tp. v. Garfield Recreation Comm.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- State v. OrensteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Triffin v. ADPNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- NJ Turnpike Authority v. O'NEILLNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- State, in the Interest of LbNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.