Legal Opinion

United States v. Martignon

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 24, 2004No. 03 Cr. 1287(HB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

BAER, District Judge. 1

Defendant Jean Martignon (“Martig-non”) moves pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (“Fed. R.Crim.P.”) to dismiss the one-count Indictment, charging him with a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2319A (“anti-bootlegging statute” or “statute”). Martignon mounts his challenge on several constitutional grounds — namely that (1) by virtue of its regulation of live performances for an unlimited period of time, the anti-bootlegging statute exceeds the Copyright Clause’s authority to protect the right of artists 2 to their ‘Writings” for…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Public Citizen v. United States Department of JusticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Garcia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kiss Catalog, Ltd. v. Passport International Productions, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2005
  2. United States v. MartignonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API