Legal Opinion

Lopez v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 1, 1990PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by ordering separate trials on the issues of liability and damages since the question of damages was not interwoven with that of liability. At the trial of this personal injury action, it was the infant plaintiff’s theory of liability that there should have been rubber mats on the ground near the slide from which she fell. There was no need to resort to medical evidence of plaintiff’s injuries to establish that the mats were not in place (compare, Schwartz v Binder, 91 AD2d 660). Nor did the absence of medical evidence make the court’s instructions…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schwartz v. BinderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Berthoumieux v. We Try Harder, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API