Legal Opinion

Bryson v. Carroll

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 6, 1945No. 3507PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, C. J.

According to the defendant’s testimony, the plaintiff had in his herd of cows a so-called fence-breaker. This cow (a “big Holstein”) would “get her head through the fence and push the wires up” and then “get her front feet through, and when she did she would come through regardless of the barbed wire.” The damage of which the plaintiff complains was caused by his herd after they had escaped through the breaches in the fence which the Holstein had made. After repairing these breaches on numerous occasions, the defendant notified the plaintiff that he “could not keep the fence repaired” any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Exeter Banking Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
  2. Webster v. SeaveySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  3. Trudeau v. Manchester Coal & Ice Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  4. Andrew v. GoodaleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. St-Laurent v. Fiermonti Oldsmobile, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API