Legal Opinion

Pegasus Helicopters, Inc., a Colorado Corporation v. United Technologies Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Hamilton Standard

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 13, 1994No. 93-1199PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

In this diversity case in which the parties agree the law of Colorado is applicable, Defendant-Appellant United Technologies Corporation and its subsidiary, Hamilton Standard (collectively, “Hamilton”), appeal from the district court’s Amended Judgment of February 4,1993, and from the Order of that court dated April 2,1993, denying Hamilton's motion for judgment as a matter of law.

This case arises out of Hamilton’s manufacture and refurbishment of helicopter fuel controls for a helicopter engine manufactured by the Textron Lycoming Division of Avco Corporation…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Carmela Mares v. Conagra Poultry Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. Woodling v. Garrett Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  4. Russell Eugene Hurd v. American Hoist and Derrick Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  5. Mesa Sand & Gravel Co. v. Landfill, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Eck v. Parke, Davis & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  2. Richard Reynolds v. Dawn Jamison and Christopher DarrCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  3. Piney Mountain Coal Co. v. MaysCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  4. Loughridge v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. Paratransit Risk Retention Group Insurance Co. v. KaminsColorado Court of Appeals · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API