Legal Opinion

Winnett v. State

Stark Circuit Court

Decided September 15, 1899Published

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Stark county.

1Opinion of the Court

'Voorhees, J.

The case of Albert E. Winnett, plaintiff in error, against the state of Ohio, defendant in error, is in this court on error. The plaintiff contends that the court below erred in overruling a demurrer to the indictment upon which he was tried and convicted. The indictment charged plaintiff in error with obtaining the signature of one Swartz to a promissory note for two hundred dollars, by false pretenses.

The indictment is founded upon sec. 7076, Rev. Stat., which provides: “Whoever, by any false pretense, with intent to defraud, obtains from any person anything of value, or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dillingham v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Ranney v. . PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. State v. DeLaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  4. Commonwealth v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API