Legal Opinion
McDonald v. Colden
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1943PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRubenstein, J.
Respondent moves, in pursuance of section 1293 of the Civil Practice Act, to dismiss the petition as a matter of law.
The facts set forth in such petition may he summarized as follows: William P. McDonald was subpoenaed to appear before the Grand Jury for the September, 1940, term of the Queens County Court on November 5, 1942, at 8:30 p. m., as a witness in a criminal action allegedly being prosecuted by the People of the State of New York against “ John Doe ” and “ Richard Roe ”. At the time and place specified in the subpoena petitioner appeared before the said Grand Jury, but upon advice…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The People v. . PetreaNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Matter of Schwab v. McElligottNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- People v. . SullivanNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Matter of Reynolds v. CropseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- People v. NugentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Harrod v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952
- Lichtensteiger v. Housing & Development AdministrationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- McDonald v. ColdenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Lawson v. CorneliusNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. GomezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.