Legal Opinion · Dissent

Compagnie Francaise De Navigation a Vapeur v. Bonnasse

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 16, 1927No. 313Published

1DissentCampbell, District Judge

(dissenting) . I find myself unable to concur.

Assuming that the agreement made by Bonnasse, dated February 11, 1918, was. a maritime obligation, that is not controlling.

The obligation of La Banque Privée, as alleged in the libel, arises under the agreement with Bonnasse of September, 1921, which provided that La Banque Privée purchased all the assets and assumed all the liabilities of the banking business of La Banque Bonnasse.

The liabilities of a banking business obviously were in small part maritime, and it must be assumed that by the use of the words “all liabilities” the parties to that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. The AdaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  3. Pacific Surety Co. v. Leatham & Smith Towing & Wrecking Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1907
  4. The PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  5. Eadie v. North Pac. S. S. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API