Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Parish

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 29, 1996No. 95-CA-711PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

laGRISBAUM, Judge.

In our original opinion, the notice issue was considered by this Court. The appellant’s counsel first raised the issue of whether the appellee had proven the Parish of Jefferson had notice of the defect, in accordance with La.R.S. 9:2800, in its reply brief. Rule 2-12.6 of the Uniform Rules of Courts of Appeal provides that a reply brief shall be “strictly confined to rebuttal of points urged in appellee’s brief.”

While this Court is aware that Rule 1-3 of the Uniform Rules of Courts of Appeal allows an appellate court to render any judgment required by the interests of…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peterson v. ParishLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API