Legal Opinion
Holland v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 23, 2000No. A00A0094PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Judge.
David Holland appeals from the trial court’s order setting forth the amount of an attorney fee lien on certain insurance proceeds. For reasons discussed below, we affirm.
Many of the relevant facts of this case are discussed in Holland v. State Farm &c. Ins. Co.1 David and Ruby Holland sued State Farm’s insured for injuries David Holland sustained in an automobile accident. The Georgia Department of Medical Assistance (DMA) and Floyd Medical Center (FMC) asserted liens on David Holland’s cause of action pursuant to OCGA §§ 49-4-149 and 44-14-470. State Farm then filed an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Albany Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- GREER, KLOSIK AND DAUGHERTY v. YetmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- In the Interest of B. R. W.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- In the Interest of D. Q. H.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Recoba v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
3Cited by3 opinions
- Head v. DeKalb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Wilder v. Jefferson Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Wilder v. Jefferson Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001