Legal Opinion

McKinney v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1982No. 3-782A177PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRARD, Judge.

Daniel McKinney appeals the denial of his petition for post conviction relief which sought to set aside his guilty plea to a charge of burglary.

He asserts and the record bears out that when his plea was accepted he was not advised of the minimum possible sentence for the offense as required by IC 35 — 4.1—1— 3(d).1 The trial court found that since McKinney had entered a plea bargain which called for a specific sentence any advice as to the minimum sentence available was superfluous (Record at 114, 119).

We first note there is practical value in assuring that an accused is aware…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. German v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Turman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Ricketts v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Austin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Payton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Petersen v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Rembe v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Sides v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API