Legal Opinion
Bernstein v. Peters
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 10, 1943No. 30059PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.
The plaintiff in error contends that the trial court erred in sustaining the demurrer to his plea, which, it is urged, set up a legal defense to the action, because as therein shown the con tract was illegal and unenforceable, in that it violated the act of 1938 for legalizing and control of alcoholic beverages and liquors (Ga. L. Ex. Sess. 1937-38, p. 103; Code Ann. § 58-1001 et seq.); violated the rules and regulations promulgated by the State revenue commissioner in pursuance of the authority granted by such act, in that the plaintiffs agreed to deliver and did deliver the intoxicating…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dover v. BurnsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Stoddard Manufacturing Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Martin v. HarwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Singleton v. Bank of MonticelloSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Salter v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cochran v. MurrahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Morrell v. Wellstar Health System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Brown v. MacK Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Fields v. Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. of Conn.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Gignilliat v. BorgCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.