Legal Opinion
Earle v. Brink's Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 8, 1943PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONGER, District Judge.
Defendants moved for a dismissal of each of the above-entitled actions for failure of the complaints to state claims upon which relief can be granted. So far as pertinent the complaints are identical in all essential respects. The briefs submitted by both sides contain statements of fact which do not appear on the faces of the complaints. These will be ignored and consideration will be given only to such facts as have been pleaded or of which this court may take judicial notice.
The actions were commenced under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A.…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Wagman v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Aaron Flanzbaum, Doing Business Under the Trade Name and Style of Davaar Industries Limited v. M & M Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Potter v. Chicago Heights Motor Freight, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Southland Corp. v. ShewDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1965
- United Transportation Union Local 759 v. Orange Newark Elizabeth Bus, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000