Legal Opinion
Poole v. Greer
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided February 25, 1907No. Action on the case No. 81PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lore, C. J.,
charging the jury:
Gentlemen of the jury:—This is an action, to recover damages for obstructing a right of way.
The plaintiff, Elizabeth Poole, claims that in the year 1904, she was seized and possessed of two certain lots of land, messuages and appurtenances, situate in the City of New Castle in this county, abutting upon and bounded in part by Forrester Avenue, by virtue of two deeds of conveyance dated respectively May 28, 1891, and December 1, 1894. That she had a right of way in and over the said Forrester Avenue; that Elizabeth Greer, the defendant, obstructed the said right…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Franklin Insurance v. CousensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Raymond v. AndrewsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850
3Cited by5 opinions
- Reinhardt v. ChalfantCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1920
- Betley v. Gordy Construction Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1955
- Hutton v. OrmandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Lickle v. Frank W. Diver, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1968
- Betley v. Gordy Construction CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1955