Legal Opinion
United States Casualty Co. v. Vance
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 12, 1936No. 9742PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Chief Justice.
In this workmen’s compensation case M. H. Vance, an employee, recovered judgment for compensation for permanent total disability against the insurer, United States Casualty Company, which has appealed'.
- The cause was tried by the court without a jury. The court found, expressly or by implication, that on March 7, 1934, ap-pellee was employed by Union Sulphur Company as a “roustabout” on a drilling operation in Hidalgo county, and on March 22, while engaged with others in lifting a heavy pipe, he felt a sudden “burning sen- - sation” from his left kneecap downward to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Barron v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'nTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Texas Employers' Ins. v. McGradyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Texas Employers' Ins. v. JacksonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Morgan v. Compugraphic Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. HittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Associated Employers Lloyds v. SelfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Casualty Underwriters v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Federal Underwriters Exchange v. PolsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.