Legal Opinion

Binns v. WESTMINSTER MEMORIAL PARK

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 2009No. G038365PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION

Defendant Westminster Memorial Park challenges an award to plaintiff Kenneth Bruce Binns for emotional distress arising from plaintiff's discovery that defendant had negligently interred the remains of a stranger in a family burial plot intended for plaintiff. Defendant also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court's finding he suffered serious emotional distress. Finally, defendant contends emotional distress damages should…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Christensen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Erlich v. MenezesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Binns v. WESTMINSTER MEMORIAL PARKCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API