Legal Opinion
McCue v. State of Kansas, Dept. of Human Resources
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided November 18, 1996No. Civil Action 95-CV-2116-DESPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAFFELS, District Judge.
The above-captioned matter was tried to a jury beginning on September 16, 1996. On September 20, 1996, the court instructed the attorneys of record that it would present the calculation of both past wage and benefit loss (“back pay”) and future wage and benefit loss (“front pay”) to the jury. Because the parties disagreed over whether back pay and front pay were matters for the court or matters for the jury to decide, the court permitted the parties to brief the issue of whether the court would be bound by any amounts of back pay or front pay…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ford Motor Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Loeffler v. FrankSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Joe E. Cooper, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Asplundh Tree Expert Company, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fair v. Red Lion InnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Deghand v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997
- Rivera v. Baccarat, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Gonzales v. Sandoval CountyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1998
- Fair v. Red Lion InnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997