Cooper v. State

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of burglary, his punishment being assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

1. The insistence of appellant, contained in his, motion for new trial, that the’verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence, can not be considered for the reason the record does not contain a statement of the facts.,

2. ' The second proposition relied upon for reversal is that the juror Oxford, who sat upon ’the jury, had been challenged by appellant, and that he, appellant, did not discover the fact that Oxford was upon the, jury until the return of…