Legal Opinion

Rubin v. Smith

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTierney, J.

The plaintiff is the purchaser in the contract for the sale of real property. He alleges that he rejected the title for sufficient reasons and sues to recover a payment made on account. This is a motion for judgment upon the complaint to dismiss the same as not containing facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The complaint sets forth various alleged defects in the defendants’ title such as outstanding title in third parties. It admits, however, that pursuant to those provisions of the Real Property Law popularly known as the Torrens Registration Law the defendants’ title has been…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of New York v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API