Legal Opinion

Lumry v. State

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 16, 2016No. 108425Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 108,425 KEITH LUMRY, Appellant, v. STATE OF KANSAS, KANSAS BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, CLINT HAWKINS, KELLY RALSTON, and ROBERT BLECHA, Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Summary judgment is appropriate when the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, show there is no genuine issue as to any material facts and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The trial court is required to resolve all facts and inferences that may be reasonably drawn from the…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API