Legal Opinion
Chrapliwy v. Uniroyal, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided May 31, 1977No. Civ. 72 S 243PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GRANT, District Judge.
I — INTRODUCTION
On 28 November 1972, twenty-six named plaintiffs brought this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, [the “Act”], 1 individually and on behalf of other female employees, against the Uniroyal Corporation and their collective bargaining representative, Local Union No. 65, alleging various discriminatory employment practices on the basis of sex. Jurisdiction is founded upon 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(l).
On 4 September 1974, plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment on all issues of class liability and a motion for a preliminary injunction. Approximately…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- West Virginia Human Rights Commission v. United Transportation UnionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
- Chrapliwy v. Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1981
- Arnold v. Postmaster GeneralDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
- Uniroyal, Inc. v. MarshallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1979
- Egger v. Local 276, Plumbers & Pipefitters UnionDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.