Legal Opinion

United States v. Barry Addison Gray

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 5, 1996No. 96-10209Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

103 F.3d 142

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Barry Addison GRAY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-10209.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 2, 1996.*

Decided Dec. 5, 1996.

Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM**

2

Barry Addison Gray appeals his sentence following his conviction by guilty…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Jomar Michlin, United States of America v. Rahsaan WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Fulvio Desantiago-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Donald CatherineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. James Russell CrookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert M. PETTY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API