Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 29, 1987No. C1-86-1039, C8-86-1619Published
1Opinion of the Court
401 N.W.2d 75 (1987)
LaVonne ANDERSON, Respondent,
v.
HUNTER, KEITH, MARSHALL & CO., INC., Appellant.
Nos. C1-86-1039, C8-86-1619.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
February 17, 1987.
Review Granted April 29, 1987.
J. Dennis O'Brien, Dayle Nolan, William R. Skallerud, Lefevere, Lefler, Kennedy, O'Brien & Drawz, Minneapolis, for respondent.
Frederick E. Finch, Robert C. Boisvert, Jr., Fredrikson & Byron, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellant.
Heard, considered, and decided by RANDALL, P.J., and FOLEY and WOZNIAK, JJ.
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
This appeal involves a discriminatory discharge claim brought by LaVonne…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ford Motor Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.