Legal Opinion

Vanvaks v. Chantly

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 9, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the. same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield and Brown, J.J., concur.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Winn & Lovett Grocery Co. v. ArcherSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  2. Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. McRobertsSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. Miami Transit Company v. YellenSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  4. Brown v. PalmerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  5. Brown v. PalmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API