Legal Opinion

Wright v. Baumann

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1965PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

Plaintiffs seek to recover for a breach of agreement under which plaintiffs agreed to erect an office building and defendant, a dentist, agreed to enter into a lease of one of the offices after the building was constructed. Both parties waived a jury trial. Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiffs.

Defendant’s principal assignments of error are di rected at the trial court’s rejection of evidence tending to show that plaintiffs had the opportunity to mitigate damages but refused to do so. Plaintiffs’ objections to defendant’s questions relating to mitigation were sustained by the trial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gray v. Kaufman Dairy & Ice Cream Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Becar v. . FluesNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Wohl v. YelenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  4. Bowen v. ClarkeOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Benson v. Iowa Bake-Rite Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Futuresource LLC v. Reuters Limited Reuters S.A. And Reuters America Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Austin Hill Country Realty, Inc. v. Palisades Plaza, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. F. Enterprises, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Fernandez v. VazquezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Schneiker v. GordonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API